Introduction
Humans are creatures of God the most high compared to other God’s creatures. Bestowed on the human ability to think, the ability to sort out and choose what is good and bad. With the advantages that a human should be able to manage the environment properly. Not only is the environment that need to be managed properly, the social life of men is to be managed properly. To that required qualified human resources. Resource-minded leader, at least to lead themselves.
With human-minded leader will be able to manage themselves, and environmental groups as well. Particularly in the response to a relatively complicated and difficult. This is where the wisdom required of a leader in making decisions so that problems can be resolved properly.
Then if the leadership of an effect on gender specific. For example, a leader must be male? It was a busy talking to the general public in Indonesia, especially the people around us. They assumed that a woman has less leadership, and a man who more deserves to be a leader.
In this paper will be explain of society perspective or stereotype about woman in her domain like in society environment, university, company and other place, because there are some differences in language using include her leadership to lead an conversation among men and women and how the women use language to express her ability include women attitude language.
Discussion
1. Stereotype About Women’s Language
Example, politeness language of woman become an interesting point of men, it is a description of a personality. And other stereotype one of woman responsible are care her children, so she must be polite in conversation (Holmes 1992)
There are women stereotype language replacement based on some factors: First social factor, like in job position, domestic job can be done by men, and women work in some position so it must work and prepare. Second is education factor, it sill increase of equality in gender, third is age factor, women above 50 years old will be aware about gender because differences in social era. Forth is cultural factor, based on traditional culture, household job are woman job, fifth is religion factor, woman must serve her husband or in other word under the man position (suyanto). Based on this statement, writer still regard role of stereotype is main factor in language.
2. Women’s Leadership
Leadership means using power to influence the thougts and actions of others in such a way that achive high performance (Anderson 1988), and process of making other people are inspired to work hard in implementing important tasks (Schermerhorn, 1999) to influence others to do something like that desired by someone who wanted it (Kanter, 1979). That’s why the leadership or the leadership is often defined as the ability to influence the group to achieve certain goals (Robbins, 1998).
Gender and position determine sociolinguistic context because speaker will use different source to tell her argument. Senior Women will speak in more masculine way in work place (Schnurr 2009) to balancing gender identities and professional (Mullany 2007). If number of men higher than woman, woman will be polite, clearly and powerful when speak in front of others including women, she will be formal language when she lead as a form of professional ( Holmes 1992, Kanter 1997)
- Social status: in using standard language commonly done by women because her status lower than men
- Women’s role as guardian of society’s values: woman environment are with her children, so she expect better behavior in speech with standard language.
- Subordinate groups must be polite: women use more standard or they speak carefully and politely, as subordinate her child.
- Vernacular forms express machismo: men prefer vernacular forms because they carry macho connotations of masculinity and toughness. Therefore women might not want to use such form, and use standard forms that associated with female values or femininity.
- Women’s categories: Not all women marry men from the same social class, however it is perfectly possible for a women to be more educated then the man she marry, or even to have a more prestigious job than him.
- The influence of the interviewer and the context: women tend to become more cooperative conversationalists than men.
The problem of public response about leadership of a woman in Indonesia, Many people argue that, leadership should be held by a man. Women were considered less able to be made in a leader. They base their stance on some of the religious texts they consider to forbid women to be leaders. If one day they accept women leaders, it is because of certain political interests. And they use the excuse of emergency or any other religious pretext to justify his attitude. Thus, the acceptance of women as leaders rather than to indicate the progress of the discourse of a more pro-women.
However some barrier in women perspective language including her under men or position often in second position such as a secretary, but when he become leader, she can appear and speak formal and masculine like man.
3. Women’s Language
- Lexical hedges or fillers to clarify of her statement in speech. Example: you know, sort of, well, you see
- Tag questions, female speakers use features which indicate tentativeness, such as ‘tag questions’, ‘hedges’ and other expressions that make them sound hesitant or uncertain (Mizokami: 142). Example: she’s very nice, isn’t she?
- Rising intonation on declaratives. Example: it’s really good
- Empty’ adjectives. Example: divine, charming, cute
- Precise colour terms, Example: magenta, aquamarine
- Intensifiers such as just and so. Example: I like him so much
- Hypercorrect’ grammar. Example: consistent use of standard verb forms
- Super-polite’ forms. Example: indirect requests, euphemism
- Avoidance of strong swear words. Example: fudge, my goodness
- Emphatic stress. Example: it was a BRILLIANT performance
Conclusion
Read: Gender, Politeness, Stereotype of Women Language
- Holmes, janet. 1992. An introduction to sociolinguistic. London: Logman
- Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, 1979, ‘Power Failure in Mnagement Circuits’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 47 (July-August 1979): 65-75.
- Lakoff, R. 1975 Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
- Mizokami, Yuki. Does‘Women’s Language’Really Exist?: A Critical Assessment of Sex Difference Research in Sociolinguistics
- Robbins, Stephen P., 1990, Organization Theory; Structure, Design, dan Application, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
- Robbins, Stephen P., 1998, Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversiess, Application, 8thed, Prentice-Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
- Schermerhorn, John R., Jr, 1999, Management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.